Washington State Cities Halt License Plate Reader Use Following Data Access Ruling

Washington state municipalities have ceased using license plate reader (ALPR) cameras following a court decision granting public access to the data collected by the technology.

Police departments in Stanwood and Sedro-Woolley deactivated their cameras prior to the November 6th ruling by the Skagit County Superior Court. Subsequently, Redmond, Lynnwood, and Skamania County also turned off their cameras. This action follows a legal challenge spearheaded by Jose Rodriguez, a tattoo artist, who sought access to ALPR photos and data from approximately 50 public agencies across the state.

Rodriguez argued that the use of ALPR cameras constitutes an unwarranted tracking system. Judge Elizabeth Neidzwski ruled that the images, generated by Flock Safety cameras, are considered public records because they are used to advance governmental objectives and are funded by the cities to prevent disclosure. Flock Safety maintains that privacy concerns regarding its technology are unfounded, asserting that the cameras capture images of vehicles on public roads where there is no expectation of privacy.

The controversy highlights broader concerns about mass surveillance. Research from the University of Washington Center for Human Rights revealed that 18 Washington police agencies had accessed Flock Safety databases in 2023, with investigations conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Instances, such as a wrongful detention in Redmond due to a mistaken alert generated by a Flock camera, have further fueled criticism of the technology’s accuracy and potential for misuse.

Microsoft Halts Support for Israeli Military Unit Over Surveillance Concerns

Microsoft has taken action to cut off services for a unit within the Israel Ministry of Defense (IMOD) following a report by The Guardian detailing alleged mass surveillance of Palestinian civilians utilizing Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform. President Brad Smith announced the decision to cease and disable specific services on Thursday, citing a review that found evidence supporting The Guardian’s claims.

The company’s stance is rooted in two core principles: a longstanding prohibition against providing technology for mass surveillance of civilians and a commitment to respecting and protecting the privacy rights of its customers. Microsoft’s internal review, focused on its own business records rather than accessing customer content, uncovered evidence relating to IMOD’s consumption of Azure storage capacity in the Netherlands and the use of AI services.

The Guardian’s investigation revealed that Unit 8200, an Israeli military intelligence agency, was storing millions of Palestinian civilian phone calls. Following the publication of the report, Unit 8200 reportedly moved the data out of the Netherlands to Amazon Web Services. Microsoft’s decision follows an ongoing review and a commitment to ensuring that its services aren’t used for mass surveillance. Despite this action, Microsoft will continue providing cybersecurity services to Israel and other Middle Eastern nations.

This situation has been met with protests against Microsoft’s headquarters, led by groups like ‘No Azure for Apartheid.’ The company’s decision underscores the growing scrutiny surrounding technology companies’ role in global surveillance and human rights concerns.